Families' Anguish Over Coastal Erosion Threatening Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.
A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards
The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.
A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.
Haunted by the Past
One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy
Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.
“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”
She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Seeking Solutions and Clarity
The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.
Several families want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.
“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”
He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”
The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.